ELAN
Problem
Ischaemic stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation.
Format
International, multicentre, randomised (1:1) controlled, two arm, open assessor-blind trial.
Treatment
Early DOAC vs Later DOAC (early - 48 hours after a minor or moderate stroke, or day 6 to 7 after a major stroke; later - within Day 3 or 4 after a minor stroke, day 6 or 7 after a moderate stroke, Day 12, 13 or 14 after a major stroke)
Control
Later anticoagulation (standard practice)
Population
-
2013 participants (37% with minor stroke, 40% with moderate stroke, and 23% with major stroke).
-
1006 were assigned to early anticoagulation and 1007 to later anticoagulation.
-
Median age 77 (IQR 70–84).
Inclusion criteria
-
Written informed consent according to country-specific requirements.
-
Age ⩾18 years.
-
Acute ischaemic stroke, either confirmed by MRI or CT scan (tissue-based definition) or by sudden focal neurological deficit of presumed ischaemic origin that persisted beyond 24 h and otherwise normal non-contrast CT scan. Intravenous or endovascular treatment prior to randomisation is allowed.
-
Permanent, persistent or paroxysmal spontaneous AF previously known or diagnosed during the index hospitalisation.
-
Agreement of treating physician to prescribe DOACs.
Exclusion criteria
-
AF due to reversible causes (e.g. thyrotoxicosis, pericarditis, recent surgery, myocardial infarct)
-
Valvular disease requiring surgery
-
Mechanical heart valve(s)
-
Moderate or severe rheumatic mitral stenosis. Participants with other valvular diseases and biological valves are eligible
-
Conditions other than AF that require anticoagulation, including therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin or heparin
-
Anticoagulation above the relevant thresholds at ischaemic stroke onset or at hospital admission as follows:
o vitamin K antagonist: International Normalized Ratio (INR) ⩾ 1.7, or
o anti-IIa: thrombin time ⩾80 s and/or anti-IIa ⩾ 100 ng/ml and/or aPTT value >1.5× normal, or
o anti-Xa: anti-Xa ⩾ 100 ng/ml or ⩾0.7 U/ml
-
Contraindications to DOACs
-
Females with a positive pregnancy test at time of randomisation, a suspicion of pregnancy, or lactating
-
Patients with serious bleeding in the last 6 months or at high risk of bleeding (e.g. active peptic ulcer disease, platelet count < 100 000/mm3 or haemoglobin <10 g/dl or INR ⩾ 1.7, documented haemorrhagic tendencies or blood dyscrasias)
-
Subject currently uses or has a recent history of illicit use of drug(s) or abuses alcohol
-
Severe comorbid condition with life expectancy <6 months
-
Severe renal impairment as described in the summary of medicinal product characteristics for the chosen DOAC (e.g. rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban creatinine clearance <15 ml/min; dabigatran creatinine clearance <30 ml/min)
-
Patient requires haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
-
Patient with aortic dissection
-
Current participation in another investigational trial
-
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) at baseline or a strong likelihood of being treated with DAPT during the course of the trial. Transient DAPT is not an exclusion criterion if it is stopped prior to randomisation.
-
CT or MRI evidence of haemorrhage classified as PH1 (defined as parenchymal haemorrhage = blood clots in <30% of the infarcted area with or without slight space-occupying effect) and PH2 (defined as blood clots in >30% of the infarcted area with a substantial space-occupying effect) independently of clinical deterioration. HI1 (defined as haemorrhagic infarct = small petechiae along the margins of the infarct) and HI2 (defined as confluent petechiae within the infarcted area but no space-occupying effect) are acceptable if not associated with clinical deterioration and if the treating physician feels comfortable about treating these patients with DOACs.
-
CT or MRI evidence of mass effect or intracranial tumour (except small meningioma)
-
CT or MRI evidence of cerebral vasculitis
-
Endocarditis
-
Evidence of severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy if MRI scan performed.
Follow-up
90 days (ranging from Nov 2017 - Sept 2022)
Primary endpoint
A composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major extracranial bleeding, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, or vascular death within 30 days of randomisation.
Secondary endpoint(s)
-
Recurrent ischemic stroke
-
Systemic embolism
-
Major extracranial bleeding
-
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage
-
Vascular death
-
Non-major bleeding
-
Death from any cause
-
A binary outcome of a score of 0 to 2 versus 3 to 6 on the modified Rankin scale
Details
Baseline characteristics:
-
Baseline characteristics were similar in both treatment groups
-
Median age 77 years
-
Median NIHSS was 5 at admission and 3 by randomisation
-
Minor stroke 38% early treatment 37% later treatment
-
Moderate stroke 40% early treatment 39% later treatment
-
Major stroke 23% early treatment 23% later treatment
Primary outcome:
-
Primary-outcome composite event occurred in 29 participants (2.9%) in the early-treatment group and in 41 participants (4.1%) in the later-treatment group. The estimated odds ratio was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.14). The derived risk difference was −1.18 percentage points (95% CI, −2.84 to 0.47).
Secondary outcomes included but not all listed (see table in paper):
-
Major extracranial bleeding by 30 days after randomisation occurred in 3 participants (0.3%) in the early-treatment group and 5 participants (0.5%) in the later-treatment group (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.15 to 2.38).
-
Symptomatic intra-cranial hemorrhage by 30 days occurred in 2 participants (0.2%) in both groups (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.16 to 6.59).
-
Recurrent ischemic stroke by 30 days occurred in 14 participants (1.4%) in the early-treatment group and 25 participants (2.5%) in the later-treatment group (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.07)
Brief summary
In this trial the incidence of recurrent ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, major extracranial bleeding, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, or vascular death at 30 days was estimated to range from 2.8% lower to 0.5% points higher (based on the CI) with early than with later use of DOACs.
The primary outcome event was not statistically significant between early and later anticoagulation and suggests there is no harm in introducing DOACs early. Early initiation can be supported if indicated or desired.
PAPER: Early versus Later Anticoagulation for Stroke with Atrial Fibrillation
Date
2023
Journal
NEJM
Reference
Fischer, U. et al. (2023). Early versus Later Anticoagulation for Stroke with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med, 388 (26), 2411-2421. 10.1056/NEJMoa2303048
Content written by Dr Emily Rushton-Smith